4.7 Article

DDA validation of the mobility of earthquake-induced landslides

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages 38-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.08.024

Keywords

Landslide; Earthquake-induced landslide; Run-out; Mobility; DDA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408511]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB036204]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Chengdu University of Technology) [SKLGP2014K015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the run-out of earthquake-induced landslides. There are more than 20 mechanical models to explain long run-out of rapid landslides including some earthquake-induced landslides. However, notably few of them considered the effect of seismic loading on the run-out of landslides. In a previous study, we have proposed a model, which is called the multiplex acceleration model (MAM), to interpret the long run-out mechanism, and a shaking-table test has been performed to verify the MAM. Because the previous MAM is a conceptual model and only a single stone has been examined under sine waves by the shaking-table test, the MAM needs to be extended and further verified. In this paper, the MAM was extended by introducing the movement change that was induced by the so-called trampoline effect of earthquake loading, and the latest practical numerical simulation program, discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA), was used to verify the mobility of earthquake-induced landslides. After a conceptual landslide model was used to verify the effect of seismic loading on the mobility, the Donghekou landslide, which was a typical long run-out landslide that was induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, was analyzed. The results show that: the seismic loading could be one of the factors that could eventually help increase the run-out of landslides. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available