4.7 Article

The import competition relationship and intensity in the international iron ore trade: From network perspective

Journal

RESOURCES POLICY
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 45-54

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.01.005

Keywords

Iron ore; International trade; Complex network; Competition relationship; Competition intensity; Competition pattern

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71173199, 41701121]
  2. open project of Key Laboratory of Carrying Capacity Assessment for Resource and the Environment, Ministry of Land and Resources [CCA2017.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As a critical raw material, iron ore plays an important role in the development of the national economy, which results in intense competition between iron ore importers. Using the international iron ore trade data of the UN Comtrade from 2000 to 2015, this paper calculates the competition intensity between iron ore importers importing iron ore from the same exporters. The paper then constructs iron ore import competition networks with the importers as nodes, the import competitive relations as edges, and the competition intensity as weights of edges. Applying complex network theory, the paper analyzes the overall characteristics of the iron ore importing competition pattern, the import competition region and the main importing countries. The results reveal that the global iron ore import competition is tight, unbalanced and expanding and that the global iron ore import competitive pattern is moving from a core-periphery structure to a reticular structure. Although Australia and Brazil are both the main competition regions, the demand for Australian iron ore is more intense. The import competitive relations for iron ore exist primarily between Europe and Asia as well as intra-European and intraAsian markets. The total import competition intensities between China and Japan and between China and South Korea are much larger than other competitive relationships with increasing trends from 2000 to 2015. We propose three policy recommendations for the importers: (1) diversifying the import channels; (2) enhancing the cooperation between importers; (3) investing in overseas equity mines to improve competitiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available