4.7 Article

Nutritional quality assessment of tomato fruits after exposure to uncoated and citric acid coated cerium oxide nanoparticles, bulk cerium oxide, cerium acetate and citric acid

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages 100-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.04.017

Keywords

Nanoceria; Surface coating; Tomato fruits; Nutritional quality; Essential elements

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Environmental Protection Agency [DBI-1266377]
  3. National Institutes on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD), a component of the National Institutes of Health [2G12MD007592]
  4. USDA [2011-38422-30835]
  5. NSF [CHE-0840525, DBI-1429708]
  6. NSF ERC on Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [EEC-1449500]
  7. Academy of Applied Science/US Army Research Office, Research, and Engineering Apprenticeship program (REAP) at UTEP [W11NF-10-2-0076, 13-7]
  8. STARs programs of the University of Texas System
  9. Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (LSAMP) Bridge [HRD-1202008]
  10. Dudley family for the Endowed Research Professorship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Little is known about the effects of surface modification on the interaction of nanoparticles (NPs) with plants. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) plants were cultivated in potting soil amended with bare and citric acid coated nanoceria (nCeO(2), nCeO(2)+CA), cerium acetate (CeAc), bulk cerium oxide (bCeO(2)) and citric acid (CA) at 0-500 mg kg(-1). Fruits were collected year-round until the harvesting time (210 days). Results showed that nCeO(2)+CA at 62.5, 250 and 500 mg kg(-1) reduced dry weight by 54, 57, and 64% and total sugar by 84, 78, and 81%. At 62.5,125, and 500 mg kg(-1) nCeO(2)+CA decreased reducing sugar by 63, 75, and 52%, respectively and at 125 mg kg(-1) reduced starch by 78%, compared to control. The bCeO(2) at 250 and 500 mg kg(-1), increased reducing sugar by 67 and 58%. In addition, when compared to controls, nCeO(2) at 500 mg kg(-1) reduced B (28%), Fe (78%), Mn (33%), and Ca (59%). At 125 mg kg(-1) decreased Al by 24%; while nCeO(2)+CA at 125 and 500 mg kg(-1) increased B by 33%. On the other hand, bCeO(2) at 62.5 mg kg(-1) increased Ca (267%), but at 250 mg kg(-1) reduced Cu (52%), Mn (33%), and Mg (58%). Fruit macromolecules were mainly affected by nCeO(2)+CA, while nutritional elements by nCeO(2); however, all Ce treatments altered, in some way, the nutritional quality of tomato fruit. To our knowledge, this is the first study comparing effects of uncoated and coated nanoceria on tomato fruit quality. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available