4.8 Article

Analysis of Posttranslational Activation of Alternative Oxidase Isoforms

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 174, Issue 4, Pages 2113-2127

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.00681

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. government of Lower Saxonia (Lichtenberg fellowship)
  2. Frauenforderpool of Osnabruck University
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence Program in Plant Energy Biology [CE140100008]
  4. Collaborative Research Center 944 'Physiology and Dynamics of Cellular Microcompartments'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondrial alternative oxidase (AOX) in plants is a non-proton-motive ubiquinol oxidase that is activated by redox mechanisms and 2-oxo acids. A comparative analysis of the AOX isoenzymes AOX1A, AOX1C, and AOX1D from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) revealed that cysteine residues, CysI and CysII, are both involved in 2-oxo acid activation, with AOX1A activity being more increased by 2-oxo acids than that of AOX1C and AOX1D. Substitution of cysteine in AOX1A by glutamate mimicked its activation by pyruvate or glyoxylate, but not in AOX1C and AOX1D. CysIII, only present in AOX1A, is not involved in activation by reduction or metabolites, but substitutions at this position affected activity. AOX1A carrying a serine residue at position CysI was activated by succinate, while correspondingly substituted variants of AOX1C and AOX1D were insensitive. Activation by glutamate at CysI and CysII is consistent with the formation of the thiohemiacetal, while succinate activation after changing CysI to serine suggests hemiacetal formation. Surprisingly, in AOX1A, replacement of CysI by alanine, which cannot form a (thio) hemiacetal, led to even higher activities, pointing to an alternative mechanism of activation. Taken together, our results demonstrate that AOX isoforms are differentially activated and that activation at CysI and CysII is additive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available