4.8 Article

A Genetic Screen for Impaired Systemic RNAi Highlights the Crucial Role of DICER-LIKE 2

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 3, Pages 1424-1437

Publisher

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.17.01181

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC)
  2. ANR
  3. Fondation Louis D.
  4. CJS-INRA
  5. INRA
  6. French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [ANR-10-LABX-40, ANR-11-BSV6-007]
  7. Fondation Louis D. de l'Institut de France
  8. GRDC [GRS114]
  9. China Scholarship Council
  10. ARC [DP0988294, DP120103966, DP150104048, DP160100892]
  11. Australian Research Council [DP0988294] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) of transgenes involves abundant 21-nucleotide small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and low-abundance 22-nucleotide siRNAs produced fromdouble-stranded RNA (dsRNA) by DCL4 and DCL2, respectively. However, DCL2 facilitates the recruitment of RNA-DEPENDENT RNA POLYMERASE 6 (RDR6) to ARGONAUTE 1-derived cleavage products, resulting in more efficient amplification of secondary and transitive dsRNA and siRNAs. Here, we describe a reporter system where RDR6-dependent PTGS is initiated by restricted expression of an inverted-repeat dsRNA specifically in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root tip, allowing a genetic screen to identify mutants impaired in RDR6-dependent systemic PTGS. Our screen identified dcl2 but not dcl4 mutants. Moreover, grafting experiments showed that DCL2, but not DCL4, is required in both the source rootstock and the recipient shoot tissue for efficient RDR6-dependent systemic PTGS. Furthermore, dcl4 rootstocks produced more DCL2-dependent 22-nucleotide siRNAs than the wild type and showed enhanced systemic movement of PTGS to grafted shoots. Thus, along with its role in recruiting RDR6 for further amplification of PTGS, DCL2 is crucial for RDR6-dependent systemic PTGS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available