4.8 Article

Microscale magnetic microparticle-based immunopurification of cytokinins from Arabidopsis root apex

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 89, Issue 5, Pages 1065-1075

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13443

Keywords

cytokinins; magnetic microparticles; immunoaffinity separation; metabolite profiling; Arabidopsis thaliana; technical advance

Categories

Funding

  1. Internal Grant Agency of Palacky University [IGA_PrF_2016_011]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LO1204, LO1305, LK21306]
  3. Czech Science Foundation [GA14-34792S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cytokinins (CKs) are pivotal plant hormones that have crucial roles in plant growth and development. However, their isolation and quantification are usually challenging because of their extremely low levels in plant tissues (pmol g(-1) fresh weight). We have developed a simple microscale magnetic immunoaffinity-based method for selective one-step isolation of CKs from very small amounts of plant tissue (less than 0.1 mg fresh weight). The capacity of the immunosorbent and the effect of the complex plant matrix on the yield of the rapid one-step purification were tested using a wide range of CK concentrations. The total recovery range of the new microscale isolation procedure was found to be 30-80% depending on individual CKs. Immunoaffinity extraction using group-specific monoclonal CK antibodies immobilized onto magnetic microparticles was combined with a highly sensitive ultrafast mass spectrometry-based method with a detection limit close to one attomole. This combined approach allowed metabolic profiling of a wide range of naturally occurring CKs (bases, ribosides and N-9-glucosides) in 1.0-mm sections of the Arabidopsis thaliana root meristematic zone. The magnetic immunoaffinity separation method was shown to be a simple and extremely fast procedure requiring minimal amounts of plant tissue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available