4.8 Article

A photo-responsive F-box protein FOF2 regulates floral initiation by promoting FLC expression in Arabidopsis

Journal

PLANT JOURNAL
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages 788-801

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13607

Keywords

F-box protein; FOF2; FLOWERING LOCUS C; flowering; light; autonomous pathway; Arabidopsis thaliana

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Laboratory of Plant Molecular Genetics
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171176, 31422041, 31371649]
  3. Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering and New Products for Developmental Biology of Hunan Province [20134486]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floral initiation is regulated by various genetic pathways in response to light, temperature, hormones and developmental status; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying the interactions between different genetic pathways are not fully understood. Here, we show that the photoresponsive gene FOF2 (F-box of flowering 2) negatively regulates flowering. FOF2 encodes a putative F-box protein that interacts specifically with ASK14, and its overexpression results in later flowering under both long-day and short-day photoperiods. Conversely, transgenic plants expressing the F-box domain deletion mutant of FOF2 (FOF2DF), or double loss of function mutant of FOF2 and FOL1 (FOF2-LIKE 1) present early flowering phenotypes. The late flowering phenotype of the FOF2 overexpression lines is suppressed by the flc-3 loss-of-function mutation. Furthermore, FOF2 mRNA expression is regulated by autonomous pathway gene FCA, and the repressive effect of FOF2 in flowering can be overcome by vernalization. Interestingly, FOF2 expression is regulated by light. The protein level of FOF2 accumulates in response to light, whereas it is degraded under dark conditions via the 26S proteasome pathway. Our findings suggest a possible mechanistic link between light conditions and the autonomous floral promotion pathway in Arabidopsis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available