4.1 Article

Is the variation of floral elaiophore size in two species of Stigmaphyllon (Malpighiaceae) dependent on interaction with pollinators?

Journal

PLANT ECOLOGY & DIVERSITY
Volume 10, Issue 5-6, Pages 403-418

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2018.1434567

Keywords

elaiophore; flower-bee interaction; Malpighiaceae; oil-collecting bees; oil-rewarding flowers

Categories

Funding

  1. CONICET [PIP11220110100312]
  2. ANPCyT [PICT 2013-1867]
  3. UBA Argentina [UBACyT20020130200203BA]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Intraspecific variations in floral traits of species over its geographic range can be associated with differences in pollinator assemblages and/or with environmental conditions.Aims: We evaluated the area of elaiophores in different populations of Stigmaphyllon bonariense (n=9) and S. jatrophifolium (n=6), and we hypothesised a marked reduction in their size towards their southern limits of distribution, associated with different oil-collecting bee assemblages.Methods: Area of elaiophores was calculated and we carried out linear correlations with floral size, pollinators, visitation rate and pollinator size along the latitudinal gradient of the plants' distributions. Moreover, we examined the relative size relationships using allometric analyses, to verify this reduction.Results: Floral elaiophore area decreased with latitude. However, for S. bonariense we observed an allometric reduction in elaiophore area with respect to floral size, while for S. jatrophifolium an isometric reduction was found. In both species, pollinator richness and visitation rate did not diminish with latitude, but pollinator size for S. bonariense varied.Conclusions: Our results show a reduction in the size of elaiophores in both species along their distribution range, with dissimilar tendencies, suggesting that these species may have different selection pressures that cause variation of their phenotypic traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available