4.7 Article

Does the turgor loss point characterize drought response in dryland plants?

Journal

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 1500-1511

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12948

Keywords

isohydry; P-V curve; TLP; water relations

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council - Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment, Melbourne Water, City of Melbourne [LP0990704]
  2. Committee for Melbourne
  3. Australian Research Council [LP0990704] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The water potential at turgor loss point (Psi(tlp)) has been suggested as a key functional trait for determining plant drought tolerance, because of its close relationship with stomatal closure. Psi(tlp) may indicate drought tolerance as plants, which maintain gas exchange at lower midday water potentials as soil water availability declines also have lower Psi(tlp). We evaluated 17 species from seasonally dry habitats, representing a range of life-forms, under well-watered and drought conditions, to determine how Psi(tlp) relates to stomatal sensitivity (pre-dawn water potential at stomatal closure: Psi g(s0)) and drought strategy (degree of isohydry or anisohydry; Delta Psi(MD) between well-watered conditions and stomatal closure). Although Psi g(s0) was related to Psi(tlp), Psi g(s0) was better related to drought strategy (Delta Psi(MD)). Drought avoiders (isohydric) closed stomata at water potentials higher than their Psi(tlp); whereas, drought tolerant (anisohydric) species maintained stomatal conductance at lower water potentials than their Psi(tlp) and were more dehydration tolerant. There was no significant relationship between Psi(tlp) and Delta Psi(MD). While Psi(tlp) has been related to biome water availability, we found that Psi(tlp) did not relate strongly to stomatal closure or drought strategy, for either drought avoiders or tolerators. We therefore suggest caution in using Psi(tlp) to predict vulnerability to drought.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available