4.5 Review

A Systematic Review on Healthcare Analytics: Application and Theoretical Perspective of Data Mining

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare6020054

Keywords

healthcare; data analytics; data mining; big data; healthcare informatics; literature review

Funding

  1. CTSA from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) [TL1 TR001864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The growing healthcare industry is generating a large volume of useful data on patient demographics, treatment plans, payment, and insurance coverage-attracting the attention of clinicians and scientists alike. In recent years, a number of peer-reviewed articles have addressed different dimensions of data mining application in healthcare. However, the lack of a comprehensive and systematic narrative motivated us to construct a literature review on this topic. In this paper, we present a review of the literature on healthcare analytics using data mining and big data. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a database search between 2005 and 2016. Critical elements of the selected studies-healthcare sub-areas, data mining techniques, types of analytics, data, and data sources-were extracted to provide a systematic view of development in this field and possible future directions. We found that the existing literature mostly examines analytics in clinical and administrative decision-making. Use of human-generated data is predominant considering the wide adoption of Electronic Medical Record in clinical care. However, analytics based on website and social media data has been increasing in recent years. Lack of prescriptive analytics in practice and integration of domain expert knowledge in the decision-making process emphasizes the necessity of future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available