4.7 Article

Community structure and diversity of endophytic bacteria in seeds of three consecutive generations of Crotalaria pumila growing on metal mine residues

Journal

PLANT AND SOIL
Volume 422, Issue 1-2, Pages 51-66

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3176-2

Keywords

Bacterial seed endophytes; Trace metals; Phytoremediation; Pyrosequencing

Funding

  1. BOFBILA grant from Hasselt University
  2. Hasselt University Methusalem project [08M03VGRJ]
  3. CONACYT [PDCPN2013-1-215241]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the possible transgenerational transfer of bacterial seed endophytes across three consecutive seed generations of Crotalaria pumila growing on a metal mining site in Mexico. Seeds were collected during three successive years in the semi-arid region of Zimapan, Mexico. Total communities of seed endophytes were investigated using DNA extraction from surface sterilized seeds and 454 pyrosequencing of the V5-V7 hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene. The communities consisted of an average of 75 operational taxonomic units (OTUs); richness and diversity did not change across years. Methylobacterium, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium and eight other OTUs constituted > 60% of the community in each generation. The microbiome was dominated by Methylobacterium (present in > 80% of samples). Functions associated with the microbiome were C and N fixation, oxidative phosphorylation and photosynthesis activity. The bacterial endophytic communities were similar across three consecutive seed generations. Among the core microbiome Methylobacterium strains were the most abundant and they can contribute to nutrient acquisition, plant growth promotion and stress resilience to their host in metal contaminated mine residues. Identification of the seed microbiome of C. pumila may lead to novel and more efficient inoculants for microbe-assisted phytoremediation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available