4.6 Article

Relationship Between Foveal Cone Structure and Visual Acuity Measured With Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in Retinal Degeneration

Journal

INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE
Volume 59, Issue 8, Pages 3385-3393

Publisher

ASSOC RESEARCH VISION OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-23708

Keywords

adaptive optics; visual acuity; cone photoreceptors; inherited retinal degeneration

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [EY023591, EY002162]
  2. Food and Drug Administration [R01-41001]
  3. Foundation Fighting Blindness
  4. Research to Prevent Blindness Nelson Trust Award for Retinitis Pigmentosa and Unrestricted Funds
  5. The Bernard A. Newcomb Macular Degeneration Fund
  6. That Man May See, Inc.
  7. Hope for Vision
  8. Beckman Initiative for Macular Research Grant
  9. Claire Giannini Foundation
  10. NIH [5T32EY007043-37]
  11. Minnie Flaura Turner Memorial Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE. To evaluate foveal function in patients with inherited retinal degenerations (IRD) by measuring visual acuity (VA) after correction of higher-order aberrations. METHODS. Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) was used to image cones in 4 healthy subjects and 15 patients with IRD. The 840-nm scanning laser delivered an E optotype to measure AOSLO-mediated VA (AOSLO-VA). Cone spacing was measured at the preferred retinal locus by two independent graders and the percentage of cones below the average density of 47 age-similar healthy subjects was computed. Cone spacing was correlated with best-corrected VA measured with the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol (ETDRS-VA), AOSLO-VA, and foveal sensitivity. RESULTS. ETDRS-VA significantly correlated with AOSLO-VA (rho = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5-0.9). Cone spacing correlated with AOSLO-VA (rho = 0.54, 95% CI 0.02-0.7), and negatively correlated with ETDRS letters read (rho = -0.64, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.2). AOSLO-VA remained >= 20/20 until cones decreased to 40.2% (CI 31.1-45.5) below normal. Similarly, ETDRS-VA remained >= 20/20 until cones were 42.0% (95% CI 36.5-46.1) below normal. Cone spacing z scores negatively correlated with foveal sensitivity (rho = -0.79, 95% CI -0.9 to -0.4) and foveal sensitivity was >= 35 dB until cones were 43.1% (95% CI 39.3-46.6) below average. CONCLUSIONS. VA and foveal cone spacing were weakly correlated until cones were reduced by 40% to 43% below normal. The relationship suggests that VA is an insensitive measure of foveal cone survival; cone spacing may be a more sensitive measure of cone loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available