4.5 Article

Is decision making in hypoxia affected by pre-acclimatisation? A randomized controlled trial

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 236-242

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.02.018

Keywords

Acclimatisation; Acute mountain sickness; Risk taking; Decision making; Intermittent hypoxia; Mountaineering

Funding

  1. Austrian National Bank (OENB) [14287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Decision making is impaired in hypoxic environments, which may have serious or even lethal consequences for mountaineers. An acclimatisation period prior to high altitude exposures may help to overcome adverse effects of hypoxia. Thus, we investigated possible effects of short-term pre-acclimatisation on decision making in hypoxia. Methods: In a randomized controlled study design, 52 healthy participants were allocated to a hypoxia group (HG: short-term pre-acclimatisation by the use of intermittent hypoxia 7 x 1 h at FiO2 = 12.6%, equivalent to 4500 m) or a control group (CG: sham pre-acclimatisation 7 x 1 h at FiO(2) = 20.9%, equivalent to 600 m). The number of risky decisions was assessed using the Game of Dice Task at four time points during a 12-hours stay in hypoxia (FiO2 = 12.6%). Results: 42 (HG: 27, CG: 25) participants completed the study. The number of risky decisions was significantly (p = 0.048 as determined by 4 x 2 ANCOVA) reduced in the hypoxia group compared to the control group, partial eta(2) = 0.11, when the age-effect on decision making was controlled. Self-reported positive affective valence prior to decision making was negatively related to the number of risky decisions, r < -038. Conclusion: Short-term pre-acclimatisation might influence decision making in hypoxia in a positive way and might be considered as a risk-reducing preparation method prior to exposures to hypoxic environments. Positive affective states seem to have a medium-sized protective effect against risky decision making. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available