4.8 Review

Biological entities as chemical reactors for synthesis of nanomaterials: Progress, challenges and future perspective

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 13-28

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.02.003

Keywords

Nanomaterials; Biological synthesis; Nanoparticles; Bio-reduction; Surface functionalization

Funding

  1. Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  2. Peking University, China
  3. Tianjin University, China
  4. Higher Education Department Govt. of KPK, Pakistan
  5. RMIT University, Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthesis of nanomaterials is being gained extensive attention in the fields of chemistry, applied physics, catalysis, drug delivery and the most important in diagnosis and therapeutic applications. Recently, many reports have been published on physical and chemical synthesis of magnetic as well as metallic nanoparticles (NPs) with viable surface functionalization, but still there is a dire need of such strategies that can combine synthetic methodology with stable surface modification found in nature. Synthesis of NPs via biological methods is the possible way to solve these barriers. However, systematized summary and outlooks of NPs synthesis via biological entities with various influencing factors e.g. temperature, pH, concentration of reactants and reaction time has rarely been reported. This review will present the distinct advantages of biological synthesis of NPs over physical and chemical methods. It will also highlight the recent progress on synthesis of NPs via various biological systems i.e. plant, fungus, bacteria, and yeast. Furthermore, it will explain various factors that control the size, shape, and morphology of these NPs. Finally, it would present the future perspectives of green chemistry for the development of nano-science and - biotechnology. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available