4.5 Review

Modeling Physiological Events in 2D vs. 3D Cell Culture

Journal

PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 266-277

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00036.2016

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Society in Science-Branco Weiss Fellowship
  2. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U01 CA-202123]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cell culture has become an indispensable tool to help uncover fundamental biophysical and biomolecular mechanisms by which cells assemble into tissues and organs, how these tissues function, and how that function becomes disrupted in disease. Cell culture is now widely used in biomedical research, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and industrial practices. Although flat, two-dimensional (2D) cell culture has predominated, recent research has shifted toward culture using three-dimensional (3D) structures, and more realistic biochemical and biomechanical microenvironments. Nevertheless, in 3D cell culture, many challenges remain, including the tissue-tissue interface, the mechanical microenvironment, and the spatiotemporal distributions of oxygen, nutrients, and metabolic wastes. Here, we review 2D and 3D cell culture methods, discuss advantages and limitations of these techniques in modeling physiologically and pathologically relevant processes, and suggest directions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available