4.3 Review

Ten quality indicators for endoscopic submucosal dissection: what should be monitored and reported to improve quality

Journal

ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 6, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AME PUBL CO
DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.05.42

Keywords

Endoscopy; endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD); cancer; colon; stomach; quality

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the last decade, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become more popular in Asia and, more recently, also in Europe and North America, however the issue of quality control has never been raised. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify possible quality indicators to monitor as part of internal audit process. This is particularly compelling, since the diffusion of ESD outside Asian, super-expert, high-volume, tertiary referral centers. In the current review, we raised the issue of quality control for ESD and proposed a list of ten possible quality indicators that should be monitored by each endoscopist and reported in every study reporting results on ESD procedures. We feel that these quality indicators should be used in clinical practice by endoscopists to benchmark the data with the internationally recommended standards.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available