4.7 Review

Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003

Keywords

Quantum control; Quantum feedback; Quantum optics; Cavity QED; Circuit QED; Optomechanics; Quantum nanoelectromechanics; Quantum information processing

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB921401]
  2. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program
  3. Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology (TNList) Cross-discipline Foundation
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61622306, 11674194, 61134008, 60904034, 10975080, 4361025022, 60836010]
  5. US National Science Foundation [PHY-1005571, PHY-1212413]
  6. RIKEN iTHES Project, MURI Center for Dynamic Magneto-Optics via the AFOSR [FA9550-14-1-0040]
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI)
  8. IMPACT program of JST
  9. JSPS-RFBR [17-52-50023]
  10. CREST [JPMJCR1676]
  11. John Templeton Foundation
  12. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15H02118] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The control of individual quantum systems is now a reality in a variety of physical settings. Feedback control is an important class of control methods because of its ability to reduce the effects of noise. In this review we give an introductory overview of the various ways in which feedback may be implemented in quantum systems, the theoretical methods that are currently used to treat it, the experiments in which it has been demonstrated to date, and its applications. In the last few years there has been rapid experimental progress in the ability to realize quantum measurement and control of mesoscopic systems. We expect that the next few years will see further rapid advances in the precision and sophistication of feedback control protocols realized in the laboratory. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available