4.2 Article

Relationship of maximal isometric torque produced in flexors and extensors rate to technique by judo athletes

Journal

ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 65-71

Publisher

WROCLAW UNIV TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.5277/ABB-01100-2018-02

Keywords

athletic performance; body composition; biomechanics; martial arts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Development of strength is one of essential elements of motor preparation of judo athletes. The aim this study was to examine the influence of body composition and the joint torques on successful performance of various judo techniques. Methods: Twenty-five judo athletes participated in 175 judo bouts, which were video-recorded during the All-Polish competitions. Biomechanical classification of technical actions was used. The age and athletic experience of the subjects were 18 and 8.8 years, respectively. Their body height was 179.4 cm (Martin's type anthropometer) and body mass was 80.3 kg (Sartorius F 1505 - DZA scales). Percentage of fat (10.6%) was calculated. Maximum torques measured under static conditions were evaluated 2-3 days after the tournament. Descriptive statistics and.m(-2)) were calculated. Maximum torques measured under static conditions were evaluated 2-3 days after the tournament. Descriptive statistics and ANOVA were conducted (p <= 0.05). Results: Balancing of maximum torques in the muscles of the pelvic and illiac regions caused more frequent performance of physical lever-type throwing techniques, compared to couple of force-type throwing techniques. A negative correlation was found between body fat and value of force recorded for knee flexors and between the frequency of using techniques during groundwork and torques measured in hip extensors. High correlation of fat-free mass index and relative elbow flexor torque was found. Conclusions: The relationship between body composition and frequency of techniques used in a tournament, and joint torques developed by athletes were found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available