4.7 Article

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS): Global potential, investment preferences, and deployment barriers

Journal

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 155-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.03.019

Keywords

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS); Drivers and barriers; Social acceptance; Political priority

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency [42390-1]
  2. Swedish Research Council VR [2016-06359]
  3. Swedish Research Council Formas [2016-00958]
  4. Swedish Research Council [2016-06359] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
  5. Formas [2016-00958] Funding Source: Formas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Keeping global warming well below 2 degrees C entails radically transforming global energy production and use. However, one important mitigation option, the use of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS), has so far received only limited attention as regards the sociopolitical preconditions for its deployment. Using questionnaire data from UN climate change conferences, this paper explores the influence of expertise, actor type, and origin on respondents' a) preferences for investing in BECCS, b) views of the role of BECCS as a mitigation technology, globally and domestically, and c) assessment of possible domestic barriers to BECCS deployment. Non-parametric statistical analysis reveals the low priority assigned to investments in BECCS, the anticipated high political and social constraints on deployment, and a gap between its low perceived domestic potential to contribute to mitigation and a slightly higher perceived global potential. The most important foreseen deployment constraints are sociopolitical, which in turn influence the economic feasibility of BECCS. However, these constraints (e.g. lack of policy incentives and social acceptance) are poorly captured in climate scenarios, a mismatch indicating a need for both complemented model scenarios and further research into sociopolitical preconditions for BECCS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available