4.7 Article

Accurate predictions for charged Higgs production: Closingthe mH +/- similar to mt window

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 772, Issue -, Pages 87-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.06.037

Keywords

Charged Higgs; Resonant diagrams; Complex mass scheme; Top quark; Two-Higgs-doublet models

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PBELP2 146525, 200020-141360]
  3. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodovska-Curie grant [660171]
  4. ILP LABEX [ANR-10-LABX-63]
  5. French state funds [ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02]
  6. Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellowship
  7. STFC grant [ST/L000385/1]
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/L000385/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/L000385/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present predictions for the total cross section for the production of a charged Higgs boson in the intermediate-mass range (m(H)+/- similar to m(t)) at the LHC, focusing on a type-II two-Higgs-doublet model. Results are obtained at next-to-leading order (NLO) accuracy in QCD perturbation theory, by studying the full process pp -> H +/- W -/+ b (b) over bar in the complex-(top)-mass scheme with massive bottom quarks. Compared to lowest-order predictions, NLO corrections have a sizeable impact: they increase the cross section by roughly 50% and reduce uncertainties due to scale variations by more than a factor of two. Our computation reliably interpolates between the low- and high-mass regime. Our results provide the first NLO prediction for charged Higgs production in the intermediate-mass range and therefore allow to have NLO accurate predictions in the full m(H)+/- range. The extension of our results to different realisations of the two-Higgs-doublet model or to the supersymmetric case is also discussed. Crown Copyright (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier B. V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available