4.1 Article

Preferences for Depression Help-Seeking Among Vietnamese American Adults

Journal

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages 748-756

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0199-3

Keywords

Help-seeking; Depression; Vietnamese Americans; Mental health

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute [CA109091]
  2. National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA007250]
  3. Asian American Research Center on Health (ARCH)
  4. Jenkins-Bernen Endowment
  5. Vietnamese Community Health Promotion Project's Community Advisory Board
  6. Vietnamese Reach for Health Coalition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Culture impacts help-seeking preferences. We examined Vietnamese Americans' help-seeking preferences for depressive symptoms, through a telephone survey (N = 1666). A vignette describing an age- and gender-matched individual with depression was presented, and respondents chose from a list of options and provided open-ended responses about their help-seeking preferences. Results showed that 78.3% would seek professional help, either from a family doctor, a mental health provider, or both; 54.4% preferred to seek help from a family doctor but not from a mental health provider. Most (82.1%) would prefer to talk to family or friends, 62.2% would prefer to look up information, and 50.1% would prefer to get spiritual help. Logistic regression analysis revealed that preferences for non-professional help-seeking options (such as talking to friends or family, looking up information, and getting spiritual help), health care access, and perceived poor health, were associated with increased odds of preferring professional help-seeking. This population-based study of Vietnamese Americans highlight promising channels to deliver education about depression and effective help-seeking resources, particularly the importance of family doctors and social networks. Furthermore, addressing barriers in access to care remains a critical component of promoting professional help-seeking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available