4.6 Article

Sensitivity of simulated transcranial ultrasound fields to acoustic medium property maps

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 7, Pages 2559-2580

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5e98

Keywords

sensitivity analysis; transcranial ultrasound; time-reversal; numerical methods; acoustic simulation; pseudospectral methods

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), UK [EP/L020262/1, EP/M011119/1]
  2. European Regional Development Fund [CZ.1.05/1.1.00/02.0070]
  3. national budget of the Czech Republic via the Research and Development for Innovations Operational Programme
  4. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LM2011033]
  5. EPSRC [EP/L020262/1, EP/E050980/1, EP/P008860/1, EP/M011119/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1355002, EP/L020262/1, EP/M011119/1, EP/P008860/1, EP/E050980/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High intensity transcranial focused ultrasound is an FDA approved treatment for essential tremor, while low-intensity applications such as neurostimulation and opening the blood brain barrier are under active research. Simulations of transcranial ultrasound propagation are used both for focusing through the skull, and predicting intracranial fields. Maps of the skull acoustic properties are necessary for accurate simulations, and can be derived from medical images using a variety of methods. The skull maps range from segmented, homogeneous models, to fully heterogeneous models derived from medical image intensity. In the present work, the impact of uncertainties in the skull properties is examined using a model of transcranial propagation from a single element focused transducer. The impact of changes in bone layer geometry and the sound speed, density, and acoustic absorption values is quantified through a numerical sensitivity analysis. Sound speed is shown to be the most influential acoustic property, and must be defined with less than 4% error to obtain acceptable accuracy in simulated focus pressure, position, and volume. Changes in the skull thickness of as little as 0.1 mm can cause an error in peak intracranial pressure of greater than 5%, while smoothing with a 1 mm(3) kernel to imitate the effect of obtaining skull maps from low resolution images causes an increase of over 50% in peak pressure. The numerical results are confirmed experimentally through comparison with sonications made through 3D printed and resin cast skull bone phantoms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available