4.6 Article

Combining deep learning with anatomical analysis for segmentation of the portal vein for liver SBRT planning

Journal

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 62, Issue 23, Pages 8943-8958

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9262

Keywords

portal vein; segmentation; liver cancer; radiotherapy planning; deep learning; SBRT

Funding

  1. NIH [1R01 CA176553, EB016777]
  2. Google
  3. Varian research grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automated segmentation of the portal vein (PV) for liver radiotherapy planning is a challenging task due to potentially low vasculature contrast, complex PV anatomy and image artifacts originated from fiducial markers and vasculature stents. In this paper, we propose a novel framework for automated segmentation of the PV from computed tomography (CT) images. We apply convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to learn the consistent appearance patterns of the PV using a training set of CT images with reference annotations and then enhance the PV in previously unseen CT images. Markov random fields (MRFs) were further used to smooth the results of the enhancement of the CNN enhancement and remove isolated mis-segmented regions. Finally, CNN-MRF-based enhancement was augmented with PV centerline detection that relied on PV anatomical properties such as tubularity and branch composition. The framework was validated on a clinical database with 72 CT images of patients scheduled for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy. The obtained accuracy of the segmentation was DSC = 0.83 and eta = 1.08 mm in terms of the median Dice coefficient and mean symmetric surface distance, respectively, when segmentation is encompassed into the PV region of interest. The obtained results indicate that CNNs and anatomical analysis can be used for the accurate segmentation of the PV and potentially integrated into liver radiation therapy planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available