4.7 Article

Three-flavored nonresonant leptogenesis at intermediate scales

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 98, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.015036

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant NuMass [617143]
  2. Wolfson Foundation
  3. Royal Society
  4. SISSA
  5. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska Curie Grant [690575, 674896]
  6. INFN program on Theoretical Astroparticle Physics (TASP)
  7. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI Initiative), MEXT, Japan
  8. Mainz Institute for Theoretical Physics (MITP)
  9. International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA)
  10. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  11. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research, Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) program
  12. STFC [ST/P001246/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leptogenesis can successfully explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry via out-of-equilibrium decays of heavy Majorana neutrinos in the early Universe. In this article, we focus on nonresonant thermal leptogenesis and the possibility of lowering its scale. In order to do so, we calculate the lepton asymmetry produced from the decays of one and two heavy Majorana neutrinos using three-flavored density matrix equations in an exhaustive exploration of the model parameter space. We find regions of the parameter space where thermal leptogenesis is viable at intermediate scales, T similar to 10(6) GeV. However, the viability of thermal leptogenesis at such scales requires a certain degree of cancellation between the tree- and one-loop level contribution to the light neutrino mass matrix, and we quantify such fine-tuning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available