3.8 Article

Bad Girls Say No and Good Girls Say Yes: Sexual Subjectivity and Participation in Undesired Sex During Heterosexual College Hookups

Journal

SEXUALITY & CULTURE-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 685-705

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12119-018-9498-2

Keywords

Hookups; Undesired sex; Sexual subjectivity

Funding

  1. Vanderbilt University College of Arts and Science Social Science Dissertation Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Young people's sexuality is often discursively constructed within the confines of a masculine/feminine binary that minimizes young women's sexual subjectivity (i.e., desire, pleasure, and agency) while taking young men's subjectivity for granted. Accordingly, young women who acknowledge themselves as sexual subjects are constructed as bad girls who incite males' purportedly uncontrollable desire and, thus, invite undesired sexual attention. However, there is reason to hypothesize that young women who view themselves as sexual subjects may be less likely than other women to engage in undesired sexual activity (i.e., sex that their partners desire, but they do not desire for themselves). In this study, I used data from the Online College Social Life Survey (N = 7255) to explore relationships between two measures of sexual subjectivity (i.e., pleasure prioritization and sexual agency) and college women's participation in undesired sexual activity during hookups (i.e., performance of undesired sexual acts to please a partner and succumbing to verbal pressure for intercourse). Logistic regression analyses suggest that pleasure prioritization and sexual agency are associated with lower odds of performing undesired sexual acts to please a partner-and sexual agency is associated with lower odds of succumbing to verbal pressure for intercourse. These findings point to the importance of sexuality education that includes discussions of women's sexual subjectivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available