4.8 Article

Robust Single-Shot Spin Measurement with 99.5% Fidelity in a Quantum Dot Array

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.017701

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CREST, JST [JPMJCR15N2, JPMJCR1675]
  2. ImPACT Program of Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan)
  3. RIKEN Incentive Research Projects
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [16K05411, 17H05187, 16H00817, 26220710, JP16H02204]
  5. PRESTO, JST [JPMJPR16N3]
  6. Yazaki Memorial Foundation for Science and Technology Research Grant
  7. Advanced Technology Institute Research Grant
  8. Murata Science Foundation Research Grant
  9. Izumi Science and Technology Foundation Research Grant
  10. TEPCO Memorial Foundation Research Grant
  11. Thermal & Electric Energy Technology Foundation Research Grant
  12. Futaba Electronics Memorial Foundation Research Grant
  13. MST Foundation Research Grant
  14. Advanced Leading Graduate Course for Photon Science (ALPS)
  15. Mercur [Pr-2013-0001]
  16. BMBF-Q.com-H [16KIS0109]
  17. DFH/UFA [CDFA-05-06]
  18. [DFG-TRR160]
  19. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17H05187, 26220710, 16K05411, 16H00817] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate a new method for projective single-shot measurement of two electron spin states (singlet versus triplet) in an array of gate-defined lateral quantum dots in GaAs. The measurement has very high fidelity and is robust with respect to electric and magnetic fluctuations in the environment. It exploits a long-lived metastable charge state, which increases both the contrast and the duration of the charge signal distinguishing the two measurement outcomes. This method allows us to evaluate the charge measurement error and the spin-to-charge conversion error separately. We specify conditions under which this method can be used, and project its general applicability to scalable quantum dot arrays in GaAs or silicon.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available