4.8 Article

Measurement of the τ Lepton Polarization and R(D*) in the Decay (B)over-bar → D* τ- (v)over-barτ

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 118, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.211801

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MEXT (Japan)
  2. JSPS (Japan)
  3. Nagoya's TLPRC (Japan)
  4. ARC (Australia)
  5. FWF (Austria)
  6. NSFC (China)
  7. CCEPP (China)
  8. MSMT (Czechia)
  9. CZF (Germany)
  10. DFG (Germany)
  11. VS (Germany)
  12. EXC153 (Germany)
  13. DST (India)
  14. INFN (Italy)
  15. MOE of KISTI (Korea)
  16. MSIP of KISTI (Korea)
  17. NRF of KISTI (Korea)
  18. BK21Plus of KISTI (Korea)
  19. WCU of KISTI (Korea)
  20. RSRI of KISTI (Korea)
  21. FLRFAS project of KISTI (Korea)
  22. GSDC of KISTI (Korea)
  23. MNiSW (Poland)
  24. NCN (Poland)
  25. MES (Russia)
  26. RFAAE (Russia)
  27. ARRS (Slovenia)
  28. IKERBASQUE (Spain)
  29. UPV/EHU (Spain)
  30. SNSF (Switzerland)
  31. MOE (Taiwan)
  32. MOST (Taiwan)
  33. DOE (USA)
  34. NSF (USA)
  35. [26220706]
  36. [25.3096]
  37. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26220706] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the first measurement of the tau lepton polarization P-tau(D*) in the decay (B) over bar -> D* tau(-) (v) over bar (tau) as well as a newmeasurement of the ratio of the branching fractions R(D*) = B((B) over bar -> D* tau(-) (v) over bar (tau)) / B((B) over bar -> D* l(-) (v) over bar (l)), where l(-) denotes an electron or a muon, and the tau is reconstructed in the modes tau(-) -> pi(-) v(tau) and tau(-) -> rho(-) v(tau). We use the full data sample of 772 x 10(6) B (B) over bar pairs recorded with the Belle detector at the (KEKB) over bar electron-positron collider. Our results, P-tau(D*) = -0.38 +/- 0.51 (stat)(-0.16)(+0.21) (syst) and R(D*) = 0.270 +/- 0.035 (stat)(- 0.025)(+0.028) (syst), are consistent with the theoretical predictions of the standard model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available