4.6 Article

Monolayer germanium monochalcogenides (GeS/GeSe) as cathode catalysts in nonaqueous Li-O2 batteries

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue 31, Pages 20457-20462

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp04044j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2017YFA0204800, 2017YFB0701600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673149]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611892]
  4. Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Fund for Innovative Research Teams of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  6. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon Based Functional Materials and Devices, Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The development of novel cathode catalysts is of great importance to the practical applications of nonaqueous lithium oxygen (Li-O-2) batteries. Here by using first-principles calculations, we revealed the catalytic mechanism and evaluated the catalytic activity of monolayer germanium monochalcogenides (2D-GeXs, X = S/Se) as cathode catalytic materials. For 2D-GeXs, Li4O4 with a ring-like structure is the final discharge product. The free energy diagram demonstrates that 2D-GeSe is more energetically favorable than 2D-GeS due to its considerably lower oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) overpotential (0.94 V) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) overpotential (1.30 V), which originate from its weaker binding with LiO2 and stronger binding with the inserted Li atom. The analyses on electronic properties elucidate that the final product of Li4O4 on 2D-GeSe induces the semiconductor to semi-metal transition. Our results reflect that 2D-GeSe is an excellent candidate as a cathode material in nonaqueous Li-O-2 batteries, while 2D-GeS is not appropriate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available