4.6 Article

Inelastic neutron scattering study of reline: shedding light on the hydrogen bonding network of deep eutectic solvents

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue 27, Pages 17998-18009

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp01286a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FCT/MEC [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679, UID/CTM/50011/2013, PTDC/AGR-TEC/1191/2014]
  2. FEDER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solids choline chloride and urea, mixed in a 1 : 2 molar proportion, form the iconic deep eutectic solvent Reline''. A combination of computational and vibrational spectroscopy tools, including inelastic neutron scattering (INS), have been used to probe intermolecular interactions in the eutectic mixture. Reline's experimental spectra were estimated using discrete and periodic ab initio calculations of a molecular aggregate with two choline chloride and four urea units. This is the minimum size required to achieve satisfactory agreement with experiment, as smaller clusters cannot represent all of reline's significant intermolecular interactions. The INS spectrum of reline, compared with that of pure choline chloride, reveals a displacement of chloride anions away from their preferred positions on top of choline's methyl groups, whose torsional movement becomes less hindered in the mixture. Urea, which adopts a planar (sp(2)) shape in the crystal, becomes non-planar (sp(3)) in reline, a feature herein discussed for the first time. In reline, urea molecules form a wide range of hydrogen bonds, from soft contacts to stronger associations, the latter being responsible for the deviation from ideality. The chloride's interactions with choline are largely conserved at the hydroxyl end while becoming weaker at the cationic headgroup. The interplay of soft and strong interactions confers flexibility to the newly formed hydrogen-bond network and allows the ensemble to remain liquid at room temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available