4.6 Article

4d and 5d bimetal doped tubular silicon clusters Si12M2 with M = Nb, Ta, Mo and W: a bimetallic configuration model

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages 3115-3124

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp05964c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ton Duc Thang University (TDTU-Demasted)
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF/CREST HRD-1547754]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Geometries and electronic properties related to the ground state stabilities of several Si12M2 clusters (M: second-row (Nb and Mo) and third-row (Ta and W) transition metals, and their mixed bimetallic clusters M2: NbMo and TaW) were explored using density functional theory (DFT) computations. The computed results show that two different structural motifs emerge as the global energy minima of such clusters. They are basically singlet tubular structures in either a C-2v prism ((1)A(1)) or a C-6v antiprism ((1)A(1)) form. Other structural shapes are also possible for higher-energy isomers and in higher spin states. 58-valence electron systems including Nb2Si12, Ta2Si12, Mo2Si122+, W2Si122+, NbMoSi12+ and TaWSi12+ are thermodynamically stable as C-2v prism global minima on the corresponding potential energy surfaces. Clusters containing 60 valence electrons include Mo2Si12, W2Si12, Nb2Si122-, Ta2Si12 (2-), NbMoSi12- and TaWSi12- and they prefer a C6v anti-prism form. In the mixed MoNbSi12 and TaWSi12 open-shell systems, both resulting C-2 ((2)A) and C-2v ((2)A(1)) forms are nearly degenerate. The formation of Si12M2 clusters in such specific ground state symmetry is explained using the Jellium model and orbital interaction analyses. The investigations lead further to a proposal for a simple model of a bimetallic configuration using the nature of interactions of the transition metal d-d dimeric bond with the Si-12 host, to interpret the formation of such M2Si12 clusters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available