3.8 Article

Single pulse femtosecond laser ablation of silicon - a comparison between experimental and simulated two-dimensional ablation profiles

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 255-264

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/aot-2018-0013

Keywords

femtosecond laser ablation; silicon laser ablation; two-dimensional morphology; two-temperature model

Categories

Funding

  1. Bundesministerium fur Wirtschaft und Energie (BMWi) in the project MONOSCRIBE [0325922A]
  2. DFG [HU1893/2-1]
  3. Spectra Physics Austria
  4. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth
  5. National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ultrashort laser pulses are widely used for the precise structuring of semiconductors like silicon (Si). We present here, for the first time, a comparative study of experimentally obtained and numerically simulated two-dimensional ablation profiles based on parameters of commercially relevant and widely used near-infrared and diode pumped femtosecond lasers. Single pulse laser ablation was studied at a center wavelength of 1040 nm and pulse duration of 380 fs (FWHM) in an irradiating fluence regime from 1 J/cm(2) to 10 J/cm(2). Process thresholds for material transport and removal were determined. Three regimes, scaling with the fluence, could be identified: low and middle fluence regimes and a hydrodynamic motion regime. By comparing the simulated and experimental ablation profiles, two conclusions can be drawn: At 2 J/cm(2), the isothermal profile of 3800 K is in excellent agreement with the observed two-dimensional ablation. Thus exceeding a temperature of 3800 K can be accepted as a simplified ablation condition at that fluence. Furthermore, we observed a distinct deviation of the experimental from the simulated ablation profiles for irradiated fluences above 4 J/cm(2). This points to hydrodynamic motion as an important contributing mechanism for laser ablation at higher fluences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available