4.6 Article

What Mn Kβ spectroscopy reveals concerning the oxidation states of the Mn cluster in photosystem II

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 19, Issue 40, Pages 27682-27693

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7cp04797e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxygen evolving complex, (OEC) in Photosystem II contains a Mn4Ca cluster and catalyses oxidation of water to molecular oxygen and protons, the most energetically demanding reaction in nature. The catalytic mechanism remains unresolved and the precise Mn oxidation levels through which the cluster cycles during functional turnover are controversial. Two proposals for these redox levels exist: the 'high' and 'low' oxidation state paradigms, which differ systematically by two oxidation equivalents throughout the redox accumulating catalytic S state cycle (states S-0 center dot center dot center dot S-3). Presently the 'high' paradigm is more favored. For S-1 the assumed mean redox levels of Mn are 3.5 (high) and 3.0 (low) respectively. Mn K region X-ray spectroscopy has been extensively used to examine the OEC Mn oxidation levels, with K-beta emission spectroscopy increasingly the method of choice. Here we review the results from application of this and closely related techniques to PS II, building on our earlier examination of these and other data on the OEC oxidation states (Pace et at., Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 11145). We compare the most recent results with a range of earlier Mn K-beta experiments on the photosystem and related model Mn systems. New analyses of these data are given, highlighting certain key spectral considerations which appear not to have been sufficiently appreciated earlier. These show that the recent and earlier PS II K(beta )results have a natural internal consistency, leading to the strong conclusion that the low paradigm oxidation state assignment for the functional OEC is favoured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available