4.5 Article

The different effects of personality on prosocial and aggressive driving behaviour in a Chinese sample

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.04.019

Keywords

Prosocial driving behaviour; Aggressive driving behaviour; PADI; Altruism; Sensation seeking

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFB0802800]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31400886, 3171225, U1736220]
  3. Pioneer Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Feature Institutes Program [TSS-2015-06]
  4. National Science and Technology of China [2009FY110100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dangerous driving behaviours, as a direct cause of accidents and death, are the focus of considerable research attention. However, unlike unsafe driving behaviours, few studies have explored safe driving behaviours and their effects on road traffic. This study aims to verify the Chinese version of the Prosocial and Aggressive Driving Inventory (PADI) and then investigate the relationship between personality and aggressive/prosocial driving behaviours. A total of 303 licensed drivers were recruited, and they voluntarily and anonymously completed the PADI, the Driving Behaviours Questionnaire (DBQ), and personality scales (anger, sensation-seeking and altruism). The results of this research confirmed the reliability and validity of the Chinese PADI. Most importantly, it was found that different relationships between different personalities and aggressive/prosocial driving behaviours. Specifically, individuals with high altruism exhibited more prosocial driving behaviours, while individuals with high sensation seeking presented more aggressive driving behaviours. The importance of these findings lies in two main potential implications: developing an effective measurement of prosocial driving behaviours in China and providing favourable evidence to guide drivers toward more prosocial driving behaviours. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available