4.5 Article

Mechanism for higher urine pH in normal women compared with men

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 314, Issue 4, Pages F623-F629

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00494.2017

Keywords

net acid excretion; net gastrointestinal anion; urinary acidification; urine pH

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P01-DK-056788]
  2. National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [4-UL1-TR-000430-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulation of acid-base metabolism maintains the pH of body fluids within a tight range. Urine pH (UpH) is also regulated under normal conditions. Median pH of 24-h urines is similar to 6, but others have noted that UpH in women is higher than men, which has been attributed to differences in diet. If true, it would help to explain the fact that calcium phosphate stones, which form at higher urine pH, are much more common in women than in men. We studied 14 normal subjects (7 men and 7 women) fed identical meals in a Clinical Research Center. Urine and blood samples were collected during fasting and after meals. UpH of women (6.74 +/- 0.11) exceeded that of men (6.07 +/- 0.17) fed, but not fasting, and UpH rose significantly with meals in women but not men. Serum and urine total CO(2 )rose with meals in women but not men, and in women net acid excretion fell to zero during the fed period. In a general linear model adjusted for age, sex, and weight. net gastroin-testinal anion uptake was the main predictor of UpH and was significantly higher in women (3.9 +/- 0.6) than men (1.8 +/- 0.7) in the fed period. Urine citrate, an anion absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, was higher in women than men in the fed state, and fractional excretion of citrate was higher in women than men. The higher fed UpH in women is related to a greater absorption of food anions and raises 24-h UpH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available