Journal
ENERGY POLICY
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 61-66Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.012
Keywords
China; Cement; Total factor productivity; Eco-efficiency
Funding
- China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M551504]
- Joint Research Grant of NSFC-NRF Scientific Cooperation Program [71411170250]
- Global Research Network Program of National Research Foundation of South Korea
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [71273118, 71471076, 71473107, 71171099, 71373103]
- Humanities and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [13YJC63041]
- Ph.D. Programs Foundation for Young Scholars of Ministry of Education of China [20123227120010]
- Jiangsu University [12JDG125]
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China [14JB170002]
- National Statistical Science Research Grant of China [2014LY036]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This paper mainly compares total factor productivity and eco-efficiency in China's cement manufactures from 2005 to 2010. First, we evaluate total factor productivity and eco-efficiency of China's cement manufactures through distance function and directional slack-based measure (DSBM) respectively. Furthermore, we also explore the difference of total factor productivity and eco-efficiency. Last, we investigate the determinants of Malmquist, Mamlquist-Luenberger of China's cement manufactures through random-effect Tobit and bootstrap truncated econometric methods. We find that there are some gaps between Malmquist and Mamlquist-Luenberger of China's cement manufactures. Per labor cement industry value has U-shape relationship with both Malmquist and Malmquist-Luenberger. It is necessary to adopt advanced technology to reduce pollutant emissions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
