Visual-Vestibular Integration During Self-Motion Perception in Younger and Older Adults

Younger adults integrate visual and vestibular cues to self-motion in a manner consistent with optimal integration: however, little is cunently known about whether this process changes with older age. Our objective was to determine whether older adults, like younger adults, display evidence ol optimal visual-vestibular integration, including reductions in bimodal variance (Visual + Vestibular) compared with unimodal variance (visual or vestibular alone), and reliability-based cue weighting. We used a motion simulator and a head-mounted display to introduce a 2-interval forced-choice heading estimation task. Older (65+ years) and younger adults (18-35 years) judged which of two movements was more rightward. Movements consisted of vestibular cues (passive movement in darkness), visual cues (optic flow), or both cues combined. The combined condition contained either congruent cues or incongruent cues (either a subtle 5 degrees or larger 20 degrees conflict). Results demonstrated that older adults had less reliable visual heading estimates than younger adults but computable vestibular heading estimates. During combined, congruent conditions, both age groups exhibited reductions in combined variance, consistent with predictcd optimal integration. During subtle cue conflicts, only younger adults exhibited combined variance consistent with predicted optimal integration, but both age groups displayed leliability-based cue weighting. During larger spatial conflicts, neither group demonstrated optimal reductions in variance. Younger adults displayed reliability-based cue weighting but older adults' heading estimates were biased toward the less reliable visual estimate. Older adults' tendency to incorporate spatially conflicting and unreliable visual cues into their self-motion percept may affect then performance on mobility-related tasks like walking and driving.