4.4 Article

Optimal dose and fraction number in SBRT of lung tumours: A radiobiological analysis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.12.012

Keywords

SBRT; NSCLC; TCP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficacy of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer for severely hypofractionated schedules is clinically proven. Tumour control probability (TCP) modelling might further optimize prescription dose and number of treatment fractions (n). To this end, we will discuss the following controversial questions. Which is the most plausible cell-survival model at doses per fraction (d) as high as 20 Gy? Do clinical data support a dose-response relationship with saturation over some threshold-dose? Given the reduced re-oxygenation for severe hypofractionation, is the inclusion of tumour hypoxia in TCP modelling relevant? Can iso-effective schedules be derived by assuming a homogeneous tumour-cell population with alpha/beta approximate to 10 Gy, or should distinct cell subpopulations, with different alpha/beta values, be taken into account? Is there scope for patient-specific individualization of n? Despite the difficulty of providing definite answers to the above questions, reasonable suggestions for lung SBRT can be derived from the literature. The LQ model appears to be the best-fitting model of cell-survival even at such large d, and is therefore the preferred choice for TCP modelling. TCP increases with dose, reaching saturation above 90% local control, but there is still uncertainty on the threshold-dose. In silico simulations accounting for variations in tumour oxygenation are consistent with an improved therapeutic ratio at 5-8 fractions instead of the current 3-fraction reference schedules. Tumour hypoxia modelling might also explain how alpha/beta changes with n, identifying the clonogen subpopulation which determines tumour response. Finally, an optimal patient-specific n can be derived from the planned lung dose distribution. (C) 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available