3.8 Review

Lower prevalence of multiple sclerosis in First Nations Canadians

Journal

NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 33-39

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000418

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Health Sciences Centre Foundation
  2. Waugh Family Chair in Multiple Sclerosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background We compared the incidence and prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) between First Nations (FN) and non-FN populations in Manitoba. Methods We applied previously validated algorithms to population-based administrative (health claims) data from Manitoba, Canada, to identify all persons with MS from 1984 to 2011. We identified FN individuals using the Municipality of Registration field held at Manitoba Health. We compared the incidence and prevalence of MS between the FN and non-FN populations using negative binomial models. Results From 1984 to 2011, 5,738 persons had MS, of whom 64 (1.1%) were of FN ethnicity. The average annual incidence rate per 100,000 population was 8.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.98-11.1) in the FN population and 15.7 (95% CI 15.1-16.3) in the non-FN population (incidence rate ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.38-0.71). In 1984, the crude prevalence of MS per 100,000 population was 35.8 (95% CI 14.9-86.1) in the FN population and 113.3 (95% CI 106.3-120.8) in the non-FN population. Between 1984 and 2011, the age-standardized prevalence of MS increased by 351% to 188.5 (95% CI 146.6-230.4) in the FN population. In contrast, the prevalence ofMS per 100,000 general population increased by 225%-418.4% (95% CI 405.8-431.0). Conclusions The incidence and prevalence of MS are twofold lower in the FN population than the non-FN population. Nonetheless, the prevalence of MS in FN Manitobans is higher than in other indigenous populations outside Canada. Given reports of more rapid disability progression among FN Canadians with MS, and the rising prevalence of MS in this population, attention should be directed to the needs of this population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available