4.6 Article

Cell-Specific Gene-Expression Profiles and Cortical Thickness in the Human Brain

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume 28, Issue 9, Pages 3267-3277

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhx197

Keywords

cerebral cortex; FreeSurfer; gene expression; glia; magnetic resonance imaging; neurons

Categories

Funding

  1. Canada Foundation for Innovation under Compute Canada
  2. Government of Ontario
  3. Ontario Research Fund-Research Excellence
  4. University of Toronto

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neurobiological underpinnings of cortical thickness in the human brain are largely unknown. Here we use cell-type-specific gene markers to evaluate the contribution of 9 neural cell-types in explaining inter-regional variations in cortical thickness and age-related cortical thinning in the adolescent brain. Gene-expression data were derived from the Allen Human Brain Atlas (and validated using the BrainSpan Atlas). Values of cortical thickness/thinning were obtained with magnetic resonance imaging in a sample of 987 adolescents. We show that inter-regional profiles in cortical thickness relate to those in the expression of genes marking CA1 pyramidal cells, astrocytes, and microglia; taken together, the 3 cell types explain 70% of regional variation in cortical thickness. We also show that inter-regional profiles in cortical thinning relate to those in the expression of genes marking CA1 and S1 pyramidal cells, astrocytes and microglia. Using Gene Ontology analysis, we demonstrate that the difference in the contribution of CA1 and S1 pyramidal cells may relate to biological processes such as neuronal plasticity and potassium channel activity, respectively. This virtual histology approach (scripts provided) can be used to examine neurobiological underpinnings of cortical profiles associated with development, aging, and various disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available