4.6 Review

Lyme disease ecology in a changing world: consensus, uncertainty and critical gaps for improving control

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0117

Keywords

epidemiology; Borrelia burgdorferi; Ixodes; emerging infectious disease; dilution effect

Categories

Funding

  1. NSF [EF-0914866, 0914376]
  2. NIH [1R01AI090159, 5R01GM105246]
  3. Bay Area Lyme Foundation
  4. US Geological Survey
  5. Division Of Environmental Biology
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [0914376] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lyme disease is the most common tick-borne disease in temperate regions of North America, Europe and Asia, and the number of reported cases has increased in many regions as landscapes have been altered. Although there has been extensive work on the ecology and epidemiology of this disease in both Europe and North America, substantial uncertainty exists about fundamental aspects that determine spatial and temporal variation in both disease risk and human incidence, which hamper effective and efficient prevention and control. Here we describe areas of consensus that can be built on, identify areas of uncertainty and outline research needed to fill these gaps to facilitate predictive models of disease risk and the development of novel disease control strategies. Key areas of uncertainty include: (i) the precise influence of deer abundance on tick abundance, (ii) how tick populations are regulated, (iii) assembly of host communities and tick-feeding patterns across different habitats, (iv) reservoir competence of host species, and (v) pathogenicity for humans of different genotypes of Borrelia burgdorferi. Filling these knowledge gaps will improve Lyme disease prevention and control and provide general insights into the drivers and dynamics of this emblematic multi-host-vector-borne zoonotic disease. This article is part of the themed issue 'Conservation, biodiversity and infectious disease: scientific evidence and policy implications'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available