4.5 Article

The Effects of Air Pollution on the Brain: a Review of Studies Interfacing Environmental Epidemiology and Neuroimaging

Journal

CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPORTS
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages 351-364

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-018-0209-9

Keywords

Air pollution; Brain; Neuroimaging; Epidemiological studies; Cognition

Funding

  1. Marie SklodowskaCurie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2014
  2. EU) [656294]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [656294] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of ReviewAn emerging body of evidence has raised concern regarding the potentially harmful effects of inhaled pollutants on the central nervous system during the last decade. In the general population, traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) exposure has been associated with adverse effects on cognitive, behavior, and psychomotor development in children, and with cognitive decline and higher risk of dementia in the elderly. Recently, studies have interfaced environmental epidemiology with magnetic resonance imaging to investigate in vivo the effects of TRAP on the human brain. The aim of this systematic review was to describe and synthesize the findings from these studies. The bibliographic search was carried out in PubMed with ad hoc keywords.Recent FindingsThe selected studies revealed that cerebral white matter, cortical gray matter, and basal ganglia might be the targets of TRAP. The detected brain damages could be involved in cognition changes.SummaryThe effect of TRAP on cognition appears to be biologically plausible. Interfacing environmental epidemiology and neuroimaging is an emerging field with room for improvement. Future studies, together with inputs from experimental findings, should provide more relevant and detailed knowledge about the nature of the relationship between TRAP exposure and cognitive, behavior, and psychomotor disorders observed in the general population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available