4.7 Article

Analysis Ready Data: Enabling Analysis of the Landsat Archive

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs10091363

Keywords

Landsat; analysis ready data; collection 1

Funding

  1. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Land Imaging and Land Satellite Data Systems programs
  2. USSG Landsat Science Team [G12PC00069]
  3. NASA Making Earth System Data Records for Use in Research Environments (MEaSUREs) program [NNX13AJ24A]
  4. NASA [NNX13AJ24A, 471794] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data that have been processed to allow analysis with a minimum of additional user effort are often referred to as Analysis Ready Data (ARD). The ability to perform large scale Landsat analysis relies on the ability to access observations that are geometrically and radiometrically consistent, and have had non-target features (clouds) and poor quality observations flagged so that they can be excluded. The United States Geological Survey (USGS) has processed all of the Landsat 4 and 5 Thematic Mapper (TM), Landsat 7 Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+), Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) archive over the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, and Hawaii, into Landsat ARD. The ARD are available to significantly reduce the burden of pre-processing on users of Landsat data. Provision of pre-prepared ARD is intended to make it easier for users to produce Landsat-based maps of land cover and land-cover change and other derived geophysical and biophysical products. The ARD are provided as tiled, georegistered, top of atmosphere and atmospherically corrected products defined in a common equal area projection, accompanied by spatially explicit quality assessment information, and appropriate metadata to enable further processing while retaining traceability of data provenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available