4.6 Article

No phenotypic plasticity in nest-site selection in response to extreme flooding events

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0139

Keywords

climate change ecology; Haematopus ostralegus; extreme climatic event; learning; sea-level rise; environmental cues

Categories

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award scholarship
  2. Australian Research Council [FT120100204]
  3. Australian Research Council [FT120100204] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Phenotypic plasticity is a crucial mechanism for responding to changes in climatic means, yet we know little about its role in responding to extreme climatic events (ECEs). ECEsmay lack the reliable cues necessary for phenotypic plasticity to evolve; however, this has not been empirically tested. We investigated whether behavioural plasticity in nest-site selection allows a long-lived shorebird (Haematopus ostralegus) to respond to flooding. We collected longitudinal nest elevation data on individuals over two decades, during which time flooding events have become increasingly frequent. We found no evidence that individuals learn from flooding experiences, showing nest elevation change consistent with random nest-site selection. There was also no evidence of phenotypic plasticity in response to potential environmental cues (lunar nodal cycle and water height). A small number of individuals, those nesting near an artificial seawall, did show an increase in nest elevation over time; however, there is no conclusive evidence this occurred in response to ECEs. Our study population showed no behavioural plasticity in response to changing ECE patterns. More research is needed to determine whether this pattern is consistent across species and types of ECEs. If so, ECEs may pose a major challenge to the resilience of wild populations. This article is part of the themed issue 'Behavioural, ecological and evolutionary responses to extreme climatic events'.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available