4.7 Article

Analysis of impervious land-cover expansion using remote sensing and GIS: A case study of Sylhet sadar upazila

Journal

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
Volume 98, Issue -, Pages 156-165

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.07.012

Keywords

Remote sensing; Neural Classification; Urban Expansion; Impervious-land; Sylhet Sadar

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the Government of Bangladesh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unplanned urbanization practice creates pressure on the natural functioning of land and resources. In this context, it is essential to monitor its expansion. This study seeks to analyze the pattern and process of urban expansion at Sylhet Sadar Upazila from 1981 to 2016 by extracting impervious land-cover from satellite images and using Shannon's entropy. To find out a comparatively accurate method of extracting impervious land-cover from satellite images, three classification methods viz., supervised maximum likelihood algorithms, index-based classification and neural classification are experimenting with a single Landsat images of 2016. A method is selected on the basis of accuracy measures. The study finds the neural classification can extract impervious landcover accurately (about 90% accuracy) than other classification. This classification method is adopted to classify the Landsat images of 1981, 1991, 2001, 2011 and the amount of impervious land-cover is estimated in ArcGIS platform. Finally, the entropy value is calculated using the amount of impervious land-cover for each union and city corporation. Up to 2011, the city expands mainly along north-south direction and this expansion occurs at northen and eastern direction after 2011. The urban expansion in Sylhet city and its vicinity is scattered in nature but the compactness increases slightly in 2016. Number of Population and elevation acted as the driving force of urban expansion in case of Sylhet city.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available