4.5 Article

Sex and age differences in the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine in the forced swim test

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 81-89

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbb.2016.01.011

Keywords

Fluoxetine; Depressive-like behavior; Forced swim test; Sex and age differences

Funding

  1. Conacyt [38462]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared in males and females of three representative ages: young adults (3-5 months old), middle-aged (12-15 months old) and senescent (23-25 months old) the antidepressant-like effect of fluoxetine (FLX, 5.0 and 10 mg/kg) in the forced swim test (FST). Intact (non gonadectomized) rats were evaluated. Young adult females were chosen in proestrus/estrus or in metestrus/diestrus, while middle-aged and senescent females were selected in metestrus/diestrus. Locomotion and motor coordination were also recorded. Under basal conditions (without FLX), young adult and middle-aged females showed less immobility than Males. This sex difference disappeared at senescence because males diminished their levels of immobility. ThuS, senescent males showed lower immobility than middle-aged and young males. FIX (5 and 10 mg/kg) produced similar actions in young females irrespective of their estrous cycle phase, therefore, these subgroups were pooled in a single one. Young adult and middle aged females clearly responded to 5 arid 10 mg/kg of FLX with a reduction in immobility, while young adult and middle-aged males only did to 10 mg/kg. In senescent females 10 mg/kg FIX reduced immobility. Remarkably, in senescent males this FIX dose did not produce an antidepressant-like effect. FIX marginally affected locomotion; however, at its highest dose (10 mg/kg), and only in senescent males, interfered with motor coordination tested in the rotarod. These data show that sex and aging influence behavioral despair without treatment and after FIX. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available