4.7 Article

Performance improvement of dry cooled advanced concentrating solar power plants using daytime radiative cooling

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 10-20

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.016

Keywords

Concentrating solar power; Dry cooling; Radiative cooling; Central receiver tower; Supercritical carbon dioxide cycle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, utilization of daytime radiative cooling to enhance the performance of air-cooled concentrating solar thernial power plants is investigated. Water scarcity and environmental concerns are the driving forces for solar thermal power plants to use dry cooling systems. In order to overcome the energy conversion efficiency penalties associated with using air cooled technologies various supplemental cooling techniques have been proposed. Recent advancements in manufacturing structures with selective radiative properties have made the daytime radiative cooling to the cold outer space practical. In this work, the efficiency improvement of the air-cooled advanced supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles coupled with a radiative cooler is explored. It is shown that for the simple supercritical carbon dioxide cycle operating at hot source temperature equal 550 degrees C by employing 14.02 m(2)/kW(e) radiative cooler, it is possible to overcome the efficiency losses due to air cooling and the net output of the cycle improves by 5.0%. At hot source temperature equal 800 degrees C, the required radiative cooler area is 4.38 m(2)/kWe and respective performance improvement is equal 3.1%. For the recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle operating at hot source temperature equal 550 degrees C by employing 18.26 m(2)/kW(e) radiative cooler, it is possible to overcome the efficiency losses due to air cooling and the net output of the cycle improves by 7.5%. At hot source temperature equal 800 degrees C, the required radiative cooler area is 10.46 m(2)/kW(e) and respective performance improvement is equal 4.9%. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available