4.5 Article

Anti-Tuberculosis Bacteriophage D29 Delivery with a Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer, Jet Nebulizer, and Soft Mist Inhaler

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 10, Pages 2084-2096

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11095-017-2213-4

Keywords

aerosol; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; nebulization; phage therapy; titer reduction

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Alberta Innovates
  3. University of Alberta
  4. Australian Research Council [DP150103953]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare titer reduction and delivery rate of active anti-tuberculosis bacteriophage (phage) D29 with three inhalation devices. Phage D29 lysate was amplified to a titer of 11.8 +/- 0.3 log(10)(pfu/mL) and diluted 1:100 in isotonic saline. Filters captured the aerosolized saline D29 preparation emitted from three types of inhalation devices: 1) vibrating mesh nebulizer; 2) jet nebulizer; 3) soft mist inhaler. Full-plate plaque assays, performed in triplicate at multiple dilution levels with the surrogate host Mycobacterium smegmatis, were used to quantify phage titer. Respective titer reductions for the vibrating mesh nebulizer, jet nebulizer, and soft mist inhaler were 0.4 +/- 0.1, 3.7 +/- 0.1, and 0.6 +/- 0.3 log(10)(pfu/mL). Active phage delivery rate was significantly greater (p < 0.01) for the vibrating mesh nebulizer (3.3x10(8) +/- 0.8x10(8) pfu/min) than for the jet nebulizer (5.4x10(4) +/- 1.3x10(4) pfu/min). The soft mist inhaler delivered 4.6x10(6) +/- 2.0x10(6) pfu per 11.6 +/- 1.6 mu L ex-actuator dose. Delivering active phage requires a prudent choice of inhalation device. The jet nebulizer was not a good choice for aerosolizing phage D29 under the tested conditions, due to substantial titer reduction likely occurring during droplet production. The vibrating mesh nebulizer is recommended for animal inhalation studies requiring large amounts of D29 aerosol, whereas the soft mist inhaler may be useful for self-administration of D29 aerosol.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available