4.4 Article

Formulation and characterization of Phospholipon 90G and tween 80 based transfersomes for transdermal delivery of eprosartan mesylate

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 8, Pages 787-793

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2017.1330345

Keywords

Transfersomes; hypertension; skin; stratum corneum; lipid based formulation

Funding

  1. National Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (MAARIFAH), King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [13-NAN1268-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of the current study was to formulate the eprosartan mesylate loaded transfersomes using different proportions of Phospholipon((R)) 90G and Tween((R)) 80 (95-75:5-25% w/w). The prepared transfersomes were characterized for their vesicles size, shape, polydispersity index, zeta potential, entrapment efficiency, in vitro skin permeation, confocal laser scanning microscopy, and in vivo skin irritation. Results revealed that the formulated transfersomes were negatively charged, spherical unilamellar structure of 71.18-85.66nm with entrapment efficiency of 83.00-88.19%, and presented transdermal flux of 1.78-5.02g/cm(2)/h across rat skin. Confocal laser scanning microscopy confirmed that the formulated rhodamine 6G loaded transfersomes could penetrate deeply and uniformly into rat skin. Additionally, in vivo skin irritation studies revealed that the prepared transfersomes were devoid of any skin irritation potential (erythema and edema). Results of this study revealed that the transfersomes prepared with Tween((R)) 80 could be used to enhance the transdermal delivery of eprosartan mesylate. In conclusion, transdermal transfersomes formulation may prove to be an encouraging drug carrier for eprosartan mesylate and other actives, particularly owing to their simple formulation and unsophisticated scale-up methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available