4.4 Article

Revisiting the role of sucrose in PLGA-PEG nanocarrier for potential intranasal delivery

Journal

PHARMACEUTICAL DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 265-274

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10837450.2017.1287731

Keywords

Intranasal administration; nanoparticles; DSC; mucoadhesion; PLGA-PEG; docetaxel

Funding

  1. International Ph.D. program in Neuroscience, University of Catania, Italy
  2. Italian Ministry of University and Research [Prin2010_ H834LS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The efficient design of nanocarriers is a major challenge and must be correlated with the route of administration. Intranasal route is studied for local, systemic or cerebral treatments. In order to develop nanocarriers with suitable properties for intranasal delivery, to achieve brain and to market the product, it is extremely important the simplification of the formulation in terms of raw materials. Surfactants and cryoprotectants are often added to improve structuration and/or storage of polymeric nanoparticles. PLGA-PEG nanocarriers were prepared by nanoprecipitation method evaluating the critical role of sucrose as surfactant-like and cryoprotectant, with the aim to obtain a simpler formulation compared to those proposed in other papers. Photon correlation spectroscopy and Turbiscan analysis show that sucrose is a useful excipient during the preparation process and it effectively cryoprotects nanoparticles. Among the investigated nanocarriers with different degree of PEG, PEGylated PLGA (5%) confers weak interaction between nanoparticles and mucin as demonstrated by thermal analysis and mucin particle method. Furthermore, in vitro biological studies on HT29, as epithelium cell line, does not show cytotoxicity effect for this nanocarrier at all texted concentrations. The selected nanosystem was also studied to load docetaxel, as model drug, and characterized by a technological point of view.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available