3.8 Review

Macrophage activation syndrome: early diagnosis is key

Journal

OPEN ACCESS RHEUMATOLOGY-RESEARCH AND REVIEWS
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages 117-128

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/OARRR.S151013

Keywords

hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis; systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis; systemic lupus erythematosus; Kawasaki disease; auto immune diseases; early diagnosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a life-threatening condition, and it is a subset of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis HEW. The clinical leatures include a persistent high-grade fever, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, hemorrhagic manifestations, and a sepsis-like condition. from the clinical leatures, it is usually difficult to dt fferentiate between a true sepsis, disease flare-ups, or MAS. Although the laboratory abnormalities are similar to those of a disseminated intravascular coagulation, which shows pancytopenia, coagulopathy, hypofibrinogenemia, and an elevated D-dimer test, it can also be a late stage of MAS. Currently, MAS is still underrecognized and usually results in delayed in diagnosis, which leads to high morbidity and mortality. This literature review was conducted in the context of the clinical manifestations and the laboratory abnormalities in MAS, which might provide some clues for an early diagnosis. The best ways for an early recognition and a satisfactory diagnosis were based on the relative changes in the overall parameters from the baseline, together with a thorough and continuous physical examination for these kinds of patients. At present, diagnostic criteria have been proposed for EILH, MAS-associated systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and an MAS-associated systemic lupus erythematosus. Therefore, selecting the proper diagnostic criteria for use is essential because not all of the criteria are suitable for every autoimmune disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available